Did you guys read the latest interview with Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bater Ginsburg?  Sort of alarming if you ask me:

Frankly I had thought that at the time Roe was decided, there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don’t want to have too many of. So that Roe was going to be then set up for Medicaid funding for abortion. Which some people felt would risk coercing women into having abortions when they didn’t really want them. But when the court decided McRae, the case came out the other way. And then I realized that my perception of it had been altogether wrong.

As Ed Whelan opines over at The Corner:

Gee, Justice Ginsburg, would you like to tell us more about your views on those populations that “we don’t want to have too many of”?

If Scalia had said something this outrageous there would be impeachment hearings going on in congress today.    Liberals are so forgiving of their own, aren’t they?