from the American Thinker…

Maliki said that those advocating a withdrawal where Americans come out “sooner rather than later” are being more “realistic.

So, we’re going. But why are the Democrats making such a huge deal out of Maliki’s statements? They are giddy with joy over the fact that Maliki is acting like the independent head of a sovereign country when just two years ago they were saying exactly the opposite.

Which is it? Is Maliki a puppet or is he independent? Obviously, when Maliki isn’t doing what Democrats want he is a puppet. When his ideas reflect their thinking, he isn’t.

Wow, what sophistication. Such nuance.

Hypocrites.

That about sums it up. What can I say? Obama isn’t brave enough to ever give an unqualified withdrawal statement (except when he didn’t think he had a chance in the early primaries and decided to go for the kook-left vote) — he is always careful to leave “the details” for later… especially the important details like whether or not Iraq is a pivotal part of the West’s middle-east peace strategy… or whether or not we should keep enough troops there to keep Al Qaeda from rearing its ugly head… or whether or not the surge was a success (the very strategy he claims doesn’t work in Iraq is he is proposing for Afghanistan… ya, I’m in the dark on this one too)— Yes, these are the “details” he can always use to completely renege on his position at the moment it is politically expedient for him to do so.

Hypocrite…

This entry was posted on Tuesday, July 22nd, 2008 at 6:50 pm and is filed under Uncategorized. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.