Comments on: micromismanagement 101 http://www.blogstitution.com/2008/04/micromismanagement-101/ The Constitution, Politics, Debate, Criticism & Discussion Mon, 26 Dec 2011 20:17:12 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Blogstitution » Blog Archive » Why do these people have any credibility? http://www.blogstitution.com/2008/04/micromismanagement-101/comment-page-1/#comment-702 Blogstitution » Blog Archive » Why do these people have any credibility? Mon, 28 Apr 2008 19:32:54 +0000 http://www.blogstitution.com/?p=275#comment-702 [...] these the minds we want RUNNING the country?  (oh! let’s allow these minds to manage the economy [...] [...] these the minds we want RUNNING the country?  (oh! let’s allow these minds to manage the economy [...]

]]> By: Publius http://www.blogstitution.com/2008/04/micromismanagement-101/comment-page-1/#comment-701 Publius Sat, 26 Apr 2008 18:56:45 +0000 http://www.blogstitution.com/?p=275#comment-701 Only liberals thinks that having something for its own sake, even if its bad, is a good idea. Only liberals thinks that having something for its own sake, even if its bad, is a good idea.

]]> By: Joel http://www.blogstitution.com/2008/04/micromismanagement-101/comment-page-1/#comment-700 Joel Fri, 25 Apr 2008 15:59:14 +0000 http://www.blogstitution.com/?p=275#comment-700 um... so long as you are willing for things to get broken in the process... The point of the article is that when the lenders were operating persuant to MARKET indica. When they did this, they were able to make sound business decisions and continue to provide loans. When CONGRESS started DICTATING how lenders should behave (i.e. MANAGING)... the system fell apart. So... I don't see how you conclude that management is an improvement... it was THE CAUSE of the problem. Management is OK... just not by CONGRESS. Every time they try to "fix" the market... they cause another problem in the place of the problem they "fixed". This is a perfect example of the law of un-intended consequences. Congress causes a cricis and then takes no responsibility for doing so... and then postures themselves as the "problem-solvers"... riiight. um… so long as you are willing for things to get broken in the process…

The point of the article is that when the lenders were operating persuant to MARKET indica. When they did this, they were able to make sound business decisions and continue to provide loans. When CONGRESS started DICTATING how lenders should behave (i.e. MANAGING)… the system fell apart.

So… I don’t see how you conclude that management is an improvement… it was THE CAUSE of the problem.

Management is OK… just not by CONGRESS. Every time they try to “fix” the market… they cause another problem in the place of the problem they “fixed”. This is a perfect example of the law of un-intended consequences. Congress causes a cricis and then takes no responsibility for doing so… and then postures themselves as the “problem-solvers”… riiight.

]]> By: Priscilla http://www.blogstitution.com/2008/04/micromismanagement-101/comment-page-1/#comment-699 Priscilla Fri, 25 Apr 2008 15:40:03 +0000 http://www.blogstitution.com/?p=275#comment-699 Joel, I think at this point any type of management would be better than no management. Joel, I think at this point any type of management would be better than no management.

]]>