Here they are … in no particular order:
1. He supported Scholarships for ILLEGAL immigrants (link)
2. He supported drivers’ licenses, government benefits and in-state tuition rates for illegals (link)
3. He opposed a bill requiring proof of citizenship to vote. (link)
4. He established a partially taxpayer-financed Mexican consulate office in Little Rock, a scheme involving the lease of building space to the Mexican government for $1 a year. Why is the media not hounding him for this? (link)
5. His dangerous views on terrorism and his inability to understand their motives and purpose (link).
“We must first destroy existing terrorist groups and then attack the underlying conditions that breed them: the lack of basic sanitation, health care, education, jobs, a free press, fair courts – which all translates into a lack of opportunity and hope. The United States’ strategic interests as the world’s most powerful country coincide with its moral obligations as the richest.”
As Selwyn Duke at the American Thinker put it… “does Huck know that Osama bin Laden is worth about $300 million? I’ll also note that there is no moral obligation to use other people’s money for your government-run charities.“
4. He says he would favor a national smoking ban (and I’m not even a smoker. This kind of activity is just not the role the FEDERAL government should be playing. It’s unconstitutional and reeks of an anti-freedom mentality) (link).
5. He is pro Taxes and Big Government (link)
5a. Spending increased 65% from 1996 to 2004 in Arkansas while he was in office there. (link)
6. He has expressed an ability to be easily bought with campaign contributions (link)
In Arkansas, Mr. Huckabee was investigated by the state ethics committee at least 14 times. Most of the complaints centered on what appears to be a serial disregard for government rules about gifts and outside financial compensation. He reported $112,000 worth of gifts in one year alone, nearly double his $67,000 salary… Five of the 14 investigations resulted in admonishments: Two for failing to report gifts (one was later overturned), the other three for some $80,000 that Mr. Huckabee and his wife received but failed to initially report. One of these admonishments involved a $23,500 payment to Mr. Huckabee from an opaque organization called Action America that he helped found in 1994 while lieutenant governor, and that was designed to coordinate his speeches and supplement his income.
8. The mainstream media likes Huckabee… this is reason enough for any conservative to think twice about supporting him. (link)
Since the beginning of 2007, the Democratic National Committee has released 102 direct attacks on Mitt Romney. Rudy Giuliani has warranted 78; John McCain 68; Fred Thompson 21. Mike Huckabee? Four. The most recent of these landed back in March. GOP voters may not have examined Mr. Huckabee’s record, but the left has–and they love what they see.
I’ve got some readers that support Huckabee… and I respect their opinions… but seriously, i think we can do better… even McCain (who I dislike) would be a more reliable candidate with a better record.

Agree. This conservative Catholic supports Fred Thompson.
another good article to consider…
http://article.nationalreview.com/print/?q=MTJmYzI3ZDY1ZDg2ZWU3YTgyMTRkODNmNTU4YTkyOGY=
“He is pro Taxes and Big Government”-which Republican candidate, besides Ron Paul isn’t?
Also, I wanted to tell you that I think that you are right about what you said a few months ago, the government shouldn’t take our money in the form of taxes to run social programs, thats a role that churches and private citizens should take. I would much rather start and manage a charitable foundation that I could staff and oversee first hand, rather than to allow the bureaucratic waste that is our government do it…you wouldn’t believe the red tape involved in conducting the simplest of programs…it’s extremely frustrating.
Hm… some republican candidates are more outspoken on the matter of smaller government then others, but point taken; republicans have seemed to spend just as much as democrats. It sucks to be a conservative with the current leadership.
I’m flattered you would agree with me on the social spending stuff… and to be as polite as possible, I will concede that the church does not always do a great job of taking care of the poor, elderly, hungry, etc. Perhaps if the Church did a better job, there wouldn’t be so many un-met individual needs politicians so inefficiently try to “fix” legislatively.
Add me to the list of those who believe that churches and private citizens should fund and run social programs for the poor, and NOT the government.
“the church does not always do a great job of taking care of the poor, elderly, hungry, etc. Perhaps if the Church did a better job, there wouldn’t be so many un-met individual needs politicians so inefficiently try to “fix” legislatively.”
This is because rather than putting someone in charge of such programs with an education, strong leadership capabilities and expertise they put someone in charge who has a “good heart” which means someone who sucks up to the pastors, conforms to every word they say and kisses ass in general. I don’t believe every aspect of church should be run like a business, but I do believe in the principles of “good stewardship”, church programs could definitely be run better…
Also, to be clear, I don’t think it is my job or the church’s job to “take care” of anyone, but rather create opportunities and the occasional hand up to help people take care of themselves.
I just read that Paris Hilton’s grandfather is donating 97% of his fortune to the Hilton charitable foundation. This made me smile:)
But then I read Bhutto was assassinated and that made me frown:(
ya… crazy about Pakistan… I’m definitely not happy with that situation.