“Not in the National Interest…”

Allow me to just rant line by line about this AP story to be found here

The Democratic-controlled Senate Foreign Relations Committee dismissed President Bush’s plans to increase troops strength in Iraq on Wednesday as “not in the national interest,” an unusual wartime repudiation of the commander in chief.

Since when has letting terrorists over-run an instable country been in our national interest? Isn’t that what compromised out national interest not too long ago? Am I totally missing something here?

The vote on the nonbinding measure was 12-9 and largely along party lines.

you don’t say?

“We better be damn sure we know what we’re doing, all of us, before we put 22,000 more Americans into that grinder,” said Sen. Chuck Hagel

um… with all due respect, I’m ‘pretty damn sure’ you don’t have a clue what your doing Mr. Hagel… I mean, how hard could it possibly be to mess up a non-binding resolution which has no other purpose then to demean the president and the war effort?

Sen. Joseph Biden (news, bio, voting record), D-Del., the panel’s chairman, said the legislation is “not an attempt to embarrass the president. … It’s an attempt to save the president from making a significant mistake with regard to our policy in Iraq.”

And, lets not forget that according to General Patraeus, it “emboldens the enemy”

Hagel’s remarks were among the most impassioned of the day, and he was unstinting in his criticism of the White House. “There is no strategy,” he said of the Bush administration’s war management. “This is a pingpong game with American lives. These young men and women that we put in Anbar province, in Iraq, in Baghdad are not beans; they’re real lives.”

Beans? Ping Pong? unstinting? First, why the AP writer put such an erudite word in front of such a plain statement is beyond me. Secondly, I applaud Hagel’s attempt to explain the gravity of the matter in laymans terms… but I’m afraid the examples do not even make sense. Is he implying that Bush thinks this is a ping pong game? That Bush is treating the soldiers like “beans”? And people think Bush is the dumb one…

Bush did get a word of support from former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani, one of the 2008 Republican presidential hopefuls.

Ya! Rudy da man!
But Sen. Barack Obama (news, bio, voting record), D-Ill., … said, “I think all of us are talking about a phased redeployment which would leave American troops in the region to send a strong message, not only to the Iraqi government that we want to help them, but also to neighbors, like Iran, that we’re not abandoning the field.”
So, Mr. Obama, by leaving Iraq we “send a strong message”… that we want to help Iraq?!? Basically, if I may boil down his point, it’s important to act tough… be all big and strong in some entrenched base-camp… but actually being tough where the rubber meets the road? Well, that’s another matter.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>